Cold War and for its continuance to1956 Essay Example for Free

Cold state of struggle and for its continuance to1956 EssayHow far do you agree that ideological rivalry betwixt the superpowers was primarily responsible for both the origin of the Cold fight and for its continuance to 1956?Certainly, the ideological rivalry that existed in the midst of the East and the West, c erstrning Communism and Capitalism was the largest factor to fuel the lengthy cold contend, simply there were other smaller factors that inflamed the difference of opinion and ensured its continuance. Almost all of these factors can be draw back to the fundamental contradictory ideologies and most of which were reactions against the others respective policies, much(prenominal) as Comecome was the Soviet response to the Truman dogma/ Marshall Aid, and the Warsaw Pact a reaction to the creation of NATO. As the Second World War came to an end in 1945 it became clear that pre-war revulsion for the respective ideologies was ready to once again rear its displeasi ng head. The war time association between the US and the Soviet sodality had existed simply to unite against an oppositeness that if faced alone, neither could score overthrown. By 1945 it was obvious that Hitler and Nazi Germany were reaching the end of their powerful and annihilative lifetime. With the downfall of their enemy, the deuce superpowers had no common ground and were therefore left to return to their nations and their respective pre-war foreign policies.Both Russian and the Statesn ideologies can nevertheless be fully understood or explained by looking at their individual roots. America, as it stands today was founded less than two hundred years ago, with such a short national history and no legs to stand on, it is no wonder they are so scared of other ideologies, and insist on enforcing their bogus democracy, liberty and freedom on other countries with no allowance or acceptance of other ways of living.The basis of US foreign policy since 1945 has been the topic of containment, sketched out by George Kennan in the Long Telegram of 1946. Kennan argued that the methods and goals of the US and the SU were irreconcilable and therefore the US should attain for a prospicient manage. At some point the illegitimate government of the SU would collapse from within and the struggle would be over, as almost perfect prophecy of what was to happen years later.During the late Middle Ages, Russia had been separated from Europe by Mongol occupation, once Russia gained its freedom from the Mongol yoke and attempted to become a European power, it found that it lacked the technology and culture of the West. Furthermore, it was an underdeveloped peasant society, embracing enormous geographical expanse. The argufy was to change and modernize the country. Russian leaders from Ivan the Terrible onwards were all faced with the problem of transforming this retracted society. In 1917, the Bolsheviks inherited these traditional Russian preoccupations howalways they also inherited a confide to delimitate themselves and pursue her own unique national calling rather than simply follow in a Western pattern of development. The Soviet Union, Stalin declared, did not need the West, but could succeed on its own.Additionally, while the Bolsheviks embraced the loss vision of a universal pattern of development, they also inherited Marxs ambivalent attitude to capitalism and his desire to see its destruction. Suspicion of the West thus came to be deeply embedded in the Bolshevik wag the West was the enemy against which Bolshevism defined its identity. It was therefore, essentially, a reactive identity Soviet socialism, constructed as a protest against Western capitalism, was an anti-world to Capitalism (Kotkin 1995).Personality clashes between the two superpower leaders, Stalin and any of the US Pre emplacementnts once again comes back to their arrant(a)ly opposing ideological beliefs and their individual fears of the others possible world domin ation. So when Stalin died in 1953 it was unclear how, or purge if, Soviet politics could maintain its hard-line policies both internationally against America and internally. However, in 1956 Khrushchev, the new Soviet leader made his famous secret speech, clearly criticizing Stalin this, almost even more clearly than even Stalins death, signified the end of Stalinism. Khrushchevs appointment marked the end of the relationship between Stalin and the West. Brimming with positive ideas for peaceful coexistence, and a much larger power base than Stalins dictatorship ever allowed, the relationship between Khrushchev and the west began, and thats a whole other story.The Cold War was an ideological and geographical struggle between two opposing systems. Equally important, it was a struggle that took place during the first cardinal years of the atomic age, and the existence of thermonuclear weapons greatly affected the nature of the struggle. The black cloud of nuclear Armageddon hung over the entire cold war period. Yet, thankfully, the bomb was never used to attack after 1945 by either the United States or the Soviet Union.Although this war was nothing like either the first or second world war, the rest of the world was dragged in too. The Korean War was labeled the cold war in the east by one historian. (sorry know this bit should be much much longer)At no point in history, from before the 16th century have two superpowers been able to coexist, there has always been a single hegemonic power. Yet Hollands influence in the 16th century and Portugals small town of Spain and South America, and even the British Empire would never have been labeled superpowers. Perhaps this is because although these countries had influence, they did not have the power to destroy the world at the press of a button. Nonetheless in this nuclear eon there is even less room for two major powers, and even though the ideologies are complete opposites, the cold war can be explained as a p ower struggle between two big kids, fighting for their right to be the biggest bully in the playground.Although this certainly wasnt the first, or then the last, war that America has won I feel that this is almost the most important win in US, indeed even world, history. The battle of two superpowers, both with the ability to destroy the world, and that only, by the collapse of the Soviet Union in the late 20th century, allowed the US to appear as the winner and assume the position of the worlds only superpower and subtly declare itself world leader. I believe the cold war is one of the largest factors for do the American superiority which had the cold war had a different outcome perhaps would have been conquer or even seen the Soviet Union develop the ignorance and superiority that is so fiercely disliked by much of the world.I fully agree that fundamentally the cold war was a confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union, fuelled on both sides by the belief that the ideology of the other side had to be destroyed. It is because of this that co-existence was not possible- one side could only win at the expense of the other, no matter how long either side had to wait for their victory, the ideological hatred ran so deep that both sides that neither side was prepared to jeopardize their own way of life for the benefit of the other. The Soviet Union held to Lenins belief that conflict between communism and capitalism was inevitable.The United States believed that peace and stability in the world would only protrude when the evil of communism had been exorcised. At the ideological level Moscows communist world-view, which saw capitalism as irresponsible evil, fed off Washingtons world-view, which saw communism as an absolute evil, and in this way helped to sustain the others prophecy. every(prenominal) action that either power took was followed by an almost immediate reaction from the other, the continuation of the Cold War not only until 1956 but until the Soviet Unions downfall in 1970/80s, was continually fueled by actions and reactions which were sometimes insignificant but which also brought the world closer than ever to a full scale nuclear war.BibliographyStalinism, An Overview P. Boobbyer 2000The Cold War John W. MasonSarah Holtam Page 1 2/5/8/2007