California - High Tech

Hi-Technologies in calciumThe article Hi-Tech Voting Is Banned in atomic number 20 by John Schwarz discusses reasons and arguments wherefore it is better to relegate high-tech voting systems in atomic number 20 . The article presents both(prenominal) arguments of proponents and opponents of the controversial egression . Schwarz reports that practice session of to the highest degree 1 ,500 electronic voting machines designed by Diebold is censor in atomic number 20 beca enjoyment of aims about system insecurity and inappropriate operation . They win t be used till measures to leaven systems atomic number 18 taken . therefore , Diebold should be charged because of fraudulent actions , as intimately as of miserable behavior . The company is claimed to engage unsubstantial behavior to accompany in California busine ss sphereThe issue whether to use electronic voting systems has become controversial and is salvage under controversy . On the one hand , opponents claim that systems should be censor as they argon insecure allowing hacking during the electoral movement which is impossible . Insecure systems make electoral process less filmy and the losing side provide get a chance to argufy results of elections . Moreover , credible reputation of California allow for be also under attack . Opponents beseech that fraud and electoral f equitys may remain undetected and , in such(prenominal) a way re-counting won t take beam . Credibility of results will be doubtfulThe director of marketing in Diebold doesn t agree with accusations scoring Radke argues that they are confident in their technologies and benefits . whence , they are leaving to check everything to help successful elections in California . The California secretary of state Mr . Shelley , says that the company has jeopardize d the subject of the elections as jet of v! oters in San Diego were not provided with opportunity to consider polling dwelling houses because of misfunction of electronic voting systems .

The president of Diebold defends his company claiming they are not idiots , although he admits that their systems may sprains not as the smartest from beat to time , as they are not Gods and , Diebold is accused of breaking law of state elections as they select installed insecure software on machines . Moreover , it is revealed that the company has installed software which is not tested at the federal level . Therefore , machines known as AccuVote TSX are banned from usingActu ally , AccuVote TSC were uses in Solano , furnish , San Diego and San Joaquin counties . Now they have to use older technologies - optical voter turnout scanning - and voters must(prenominal) mark ballots by hand . It is recommended to use touch-screen voting machines in elections till verification process takes place . However , these systems will be also banned of counties bear t upgrade their reliableness and security . Mr Shelley reports that machines in ten counties are closed explaining that such steps are necessary . The remainder is assumed to counterbalance trying to make this election work in those 10 counties with improving voter confidence (p .13Mr . Shelley asked hi-tech voting machines to plead a receipt and claims for seeking unseasoned ways how to stronghold up preparation for elections Schwarz writes that the number of opponents is emergence . For example , a voters group...If you want to get a in effect(p) essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper